2000-04-24                     Senate Journal                      Page 3460
HB 296                                                                       
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 296(L&C) was read the third time.                        
                                                                               
The question being: Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 296(L&C)                       
An Act relating to partnerships; amending Rule 25(c), Alaska Rules             
of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date pass the               
Senate? The roll was taken with the following result:                          
                                                                               
                                                                               

2000-04-24                     Senate Journal                      Page 3461
HB 296                                                                       
                                                                               
CSHB 296(L&C)                                                                  
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                  
Effective Dates - Court Rule Change                                            
                                                                               
YEAS:  18   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:   Adams,  Donley,  Ellis,  Elton,  Green,  Halford,  Hoffman,            
Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie, Miller, Pearce,                 
Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                                                
                                                                               
Nays:  Parnell, Phillips                                                       
                                                                               
and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 296(L&C) passed the Senate.                      
                                                                               
Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                 
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective             
date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered.                            
                                                                               
Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                 
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule            
change. Without objection, it was so ordered.                                  
                                                                               
Senator Pearce gave notice of reconsideration.